How do you judge the decision of Jean-Marc Ayrault and Francois Hollande called for a boycott of the Congress of Versailles?
Jean-Luc Melenchon. very severely, for two reasons. The first is the life of the Socialist Party. This decision is taken in any deliberative body. It unprecedented. There was no vote to the Socialist group, or discussion or vote in national office. It's a real coup. On the merits, it is a desertion of absolute hypocrisy, since the failure to go back to Versailles in reality not to oppose, as appearances might suggest, but rather to pass the Lisbon Treaty.
you see in this renunciation does not say his name to the demand for a referendum a turning back, on the eve of the congress of the Socialist Party?
Jean-Luc Melenchon. is an event. It the first time, a spectacular fashion, the Socialist leaders decide to put in opposition to a process that gives voice to the people. All this will have cascading consequences on the lives of the Socialist Party. This is no longer the same party before and after this decision.
This posture of withdrawal does not she seduces some socialist parliamentarians yet support a referendum?
Jean-Luc Melenchon. I rather echoes the contrary. This position unworthy of many socialists, whether favorable or not the EU treaty. MPs have already announced a firm of their intention to go to Versailles. I think especially to Henri Emmanuelli and Laurent Fabius.
PS abandons he is you think a privileged opposition to Sarkozy?
Jean-Luc Melenchon. is a paradox. When Sarkozy is weakened where it is in full anti-social offensive, to facilitate its work on the so-called simplified treaty, which is in reality a concentrate of all that we fight in national policy, clui make an unexpected gift. It is unlikely to give up space when it lacking.
This decision jeopardizes the hope she finally unite the two fifths of parliament to pave the way for a new referendum?
Jean-Luc Melenchon. it makes this scenario more difficult. But the game remains very open. We do not know how to react the parliamentary socialists. The attitude of the parliamentary right is another unknown: some, anxious not to appear as endorsing this denial of democracy, may in turn decide not to vote.
Jean-Luc Melenchon. very severely, for two reasons. The first is the life of the Socialist Party. This decision is taken in any deliberative body. It unprecedented. There was no vote to the Socialist group, or discussion or vote in national office. It's a real coup. On the merits, it is a desertion of absolute hypocrisy, since the failure to go back to Versailles in reality not to oppose, as appearances might suggest, but rather to pass the Lisbon Treaty.
you see in this renunciation does not say his name to the demand for a referendum a turning back, on the eve of the congress of the Socialist Party?
Jean-Luc Melenchon. is an event. It the first time, a spectacular fashion, the Socialist leaders decide to put in opposition to a process that gives voice to the people. All this will have cascading consequences on the lives of the Socialist Party. This is no longer the same party before and after this decision.
This posture of withdrawal does not she seduces some socialist parliamentarians yet support a referendum?
Jean-Luc Melenchon. I rather echoes the contrary. This position unworthy of many socialists, whether favorable or not the EU treaty. MPs have already announced a firm of their intention to go to Versailles. I think especially to Henri Emmanuelli and Laurent Fabius.
PS abandons he is you think a privileged opposition to Sarkozy?
Jean-Luc Melenchon. is a paradox. When Sarkozy is weakened where it is in full anti-social offensive, to facilitate its work on the so-called simplified treaty, which is in reality a concentrate of all that we fight in national policy, clui make an unexpected gift. It is unlikely to give up space when it lacking.
This decision jeopardizes the hope she finally unite the two fifths of parliament to pave the way for a new referendum?
Jean-Luc Melenchon. it makes this scenario more difficult. But the game remains very open. We do not know how to react the parliamentary socialists. The attitude of the parliamentary right is another unknown: some, anxious not to appear as endorsing this denial of democracy, may in turn decide not to vote.
Interview conducted by RM for Humanity
0 comments:
Post a Comment