Wednesday, November 28, 2007
Saturday, November 24, 2007
Snowmobile Wrecking Yards Ontario
Annapolis Conference: a possible future for Palestine? The fight between students
Interview with Palestinian delegate in France before the Annapolis conference in the Journal of Humanity :
Saturday, November 17, 2007
Galvanized Boat Trailer
" I really want to fight this law! Even if I have to face the leftists, fascists who follow me in the evening to the bottom of my home ... "(Morgan, activist UNI Orleans)
What about what this girl said ... Aside from his recklessness, his simplicity and especially its lack of general history and culture that seem to undermine the objectives of the University. Indeed, a history lesson is not without reminding him that there is some significant difference between the left and fascism. In short, this article is for everyone, especially those who doubt the significant hazard that is the law on the freedoms and responsibilities of universities (LRU), commonly called Pécresse law.
Also before entering the heart of the matter, I only remember that students who are on strike against this Act or blocking their University are not horrible leftist, wicked, violent and anti-democratic!
THE DANGER OF WITHDRAWAL OF THE STATE
The will of this Act is to provide, within 5 years, all universities autonomy, allowing them to manage their budgets in particular. Thus, the first problem, of course, the disengagement of the State, State undoubtedly take the opportunity to withdraw in favor of private investment uncontrolled! Our dear Minister, is trying to discredit the current moves by saying all the media that " with an additional EUR 1 billion for the university in the 2008 budget, the state has never made such an effort . However if we take a closer look reveals that everything is a lie from the government. Indeed, it appears that for the most part, it's late payments, tax credits ... In other words, it is indeed a withdrawal of the state in a public service as more essential that Education is!
Another danger inherent in the two Universities speed. We can only note that there are already large disparity between Paris University (Paris 1, 2 etc.) and the Universities of Ontario. Autonomy will amplify this observation, although under the pressure of the first French student organization, autonomy was to be optional, will ultimately and for all ... But this will not help stem the gap is widening. There will probably tend to develop short supply chain and production in small universities lacking medium, while the powerful can do Universities do more easily.
A risk too, that the suppression of certain pipeline in some universities. Thus, non-productive sector, that is to say non-profitable because they can not directly produce wealth are in jeopardy.
Who says autonomy said increased fees . The critic of this view argue that the law states that it will make an inspection to avoid any increase in fees. But as everyone knows, the universities are already calling the "beautiful illegal registration fees! Furthermore, to see in our Voison, like England, where the fees are exorbitant, while forcing students to borrow. But in the Christian tradition which until further notice is ours, opposes this view of Anglo-Saxon is ready for anything. Indeed, It is inconceivable that a student coming out of his studies is already a loan (because of his studies) to repay!
DEMOCRACY IN DANGER
Moreover, this law endangers democracy academic in the sense that it reduces drastically the " powers" of students and contributes very exaggerated the powers of presidents University (right of veto over appointments, distribution of bonuses, etc.). These so real bosses.
SELECTION CONCEALED
The dream of all university presidents, who would like their University Paris-Dauphine to choose the best students, seems to be emerging with the guidance system is active and the possible abuse. Active guidance which undoubtedly will exacerbate social inequalities ...
What about what this girl said ... Aside from his recklessness, his simplicity and especially its lack of general history and culture that seem to undermine the objectives of the University. Indeed, a history lesson is not without reminding him that there is some significant difference between the left and fascism. In short, this article is for everyone, especially those who doubt the significant hazard that is the law on the freedoms and responsibilities of universities (LRU), commonly called Pécresse law.
Also before entering the heart of the matter, I only remember that students who are on strike against this Act or blocking their University are not horrible leftist, wicked, violent and anti-democratic!
THE DANGER OF WITHDRAWAL OF THE STATE
The will of this Act is to provide, within 5 years, all universities autonomy, allowing them to manage their budgets in particular. Thus, the first problem, of course, the disengagement of the State, State undoubtedly take the opportunity to withdraw in favor of private investment uncontrolled! Our dear Minister, is trying to discredit the current moves by saying all the media that " with an additional EUR 1 billion for the university in the 2008 budget, the state has never made such an effort . However if we take a closer look reveals that everything is a lie from the government. Indeed, it appears that for the most part, it's late payments, tax credits ... In other words, it is indeed a withdrawal of the state in a public service as more essential that Education is!
Another danger inherent in the two Universities speed. We can only note that there are already large disparity between Paris University (Paris 1, 2 etc.) and the Universities of Ontario. Autonomy will amplify this observation, although under the pressure of the first French student organization, autonomy was to be optional, will ultimately and for all ... But this will not help stem the gap is widening. There will probably tend to develop short supply chain and production in small universities lacking medium, while the powerful can do Universities do more easily.
A risk too, that the suppression of certain pipeline in some universities. Thus, non-productive sector, that is to say non-profitable because they can not directly produce wealth are in jeopardy.
Who says autonomy said increased fees . The critic of this view argue that the law states that it will make an inspection to avoid any increase in fees. But as everyone knows, the universities are already calling the "beautiful illegal registration fees! Furthermore, to see in our Voison, like England, where the fees are exorbitant, while forcing students to borrow. But in the Christian tradition which until further notice is ours, opposes this view of Anglo-Saxon is ready for anything. Indeed, It is inconceivable that a student coming out of his studies is already a loan (because of his studies) to repay!
DEMOCRACY IN DANGER
Moreover, this law endangers democracy academic in the sense that it reduces drastically the " powers" of students and contributes very exaggerated the powers of presidents University (right of veto over appointments, distribution of bonuses, etc.). These so real bosses.
SELECTION CONCEALED
The dream of all university presidents, who would like their University Paris-Dauphine to choose the best students, seems to be emerging with the guidance system is active and the possible abuse. Active guidance which undoubtedly will exacerbate social inequalities ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)